Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-sequenced with a genuine validate-and-retry loop, but actionability is held back by an undelivered 'how to ask' promise and a schema-mapping step that gives no selection criteria.
Suggestions
Fulfill the intro's 'how to ask for it' claim by adding example prompt phrasings or the specific questions to ask the user in each step.
Add concrete criteria or a short decision guide in Step 4 for mapping a source data type to an ASIM schema, rather than only pointing to the schema URL.
Clarify what to do after the schema is identified (e.g. the hand-off to parser creation) so the workflow has a defined completion point.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and step-structured with no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; each step earns its tokens, fitting the level-3 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete items to collect (documentation link, table name, workspace GUID) and a validation step, but the intro promises guidance on 'how to ask for it' that the steps never deliver, and Step 4's schema-mapping lacks decision criteria, leaving key details incomplete per the level-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced and Step 3 includes an explicit validation checkpoint with an error-recovery feedback loop ('If the query fails, ask the user to provide the information again'), matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into clear Step 1–4 sections, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for level 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |