CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agentic-workflows

Route gh-aw workflow design/create/debug/upgrade requests to the right prompts.

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/agentic-workflows/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is agentic-workflows in github/gh-aw

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable dispatcher that leans on clearly signaled external references, but it carries a redundant full file listing that hurts token efficiency and slightly muddies navigation.

Suggestions

Remove or collapse the full 73-file 'Load these files' enumeration since the task-type-to-file mapping already directs loading; keep only the mapping or reference a single index file.

Add one short example of the clarifying question to ask when the correct prompt is ambiguous.

Clarify how to resolve a task that matches multiple prompt files (precedence among the matched prompts) to tighten workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Prose is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the full 73-file enumeration under 'Load these files from github/gh-aw' largely duplicates the task-type-to-file mapping that follows, adding tokens that do not each earn their place.

3 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete, executable guidance — exact file paths per task type, an explicit overlay load via '@.github/aw/instructions.md', a precedence rule, and an OTEL cross-reference — with only minor gaps (no example of the clarifying question).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The dispatcher sequence (identify task type, load matching prompt, follow it; ask a clarifying question if unclear) is clear with a feedback checkpoint, but there are no explicit validation steps — acceptable since this is a non-destructive router.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview pointing to one-level-deep referenced files with clearly signaled paths and a task-to-file navigation map; the redundant full file listing is a minor organization gap rather than a structural flaw.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a clear niche with several relevant trigger terms, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when ...' clause and the skill's actual action is a single routing verb, capping completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause, e.g. 'Use when a user asks to design, create, update, debug, or upgrade GitHub Agentic Workflows.'

Surface a couple of natural user synonyms (e.g. 'GitHub Agentic Workflows', '.github/aw') alongside 'gh-aw' to broaden trigger coverage.

State the routing/dispatch action more concretely, e.g. 'Identifies the task type and loads the matching workflow prompt file.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('gh-aw workflow') and enumerates task types ('design/create/debug/upgrade'), but the skill's own action is a single verb ('Route ... to the right prompts'), so concrete action coverage is limited to one routing capability.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states the 'what' (route requests to matching prompts) and implies the 'when' via the listed task types, but there is no explicit 'Use when ...' clause in the description itself, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'workflow design', 'create', 'debug', and 'upgrade' are natural phrases a user would say for this domain; 'gh-aw' is somewhat jargony and a few common synonyms are missing, so it is above the midpoint but not comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'gh-aw' / 'GitHub Agentic Workflows' niche is clearly distinct with specific triggers, though the generic word 'workflow' leaves minor overlap risk with general workflow-related skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Azure/azure-sdk-for-net
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.