Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured orchestration skill with clear sequencing and a validation loop. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it references a non-existent bundle file, and tool-invocation syntax is left implicit.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced references/feedback-resolution-steps.md file (or remove the dangling links) so the cited post-delegation follow-up and categorization guidance actually resolve.
Add minimal invocation syntax or argument shapes for each MCP tool in the table so the Resolve and Validate steps are copy-paste ready.
Make the validation checkpoint in Step 4 explicit (e.g., "only proceed to Confirm when validation, regenerate, build, and test all pass") to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of basic concepts, and every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, named MCP tools and specific per-step guidance, but lacks exact invocation syntax/arguments for each tool, leaving minor execution gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step Retrieve→Categorize→Resolve→Validate→Confirm sequence with an explicit validation step and a troubleshooting feedback loop, though error-recovery checkpoints are described only lightly. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well organized and points to references/feedback-resolution-steps.md, but no references/ directory exists, so the cited file is a dangling reference rather than a real one-level-deep resource. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |