CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aeon-deal-flow

Weekly funding round tracker across configurable verticals (AI, crypto, prediction markets, agentic infrastructure, etc.). Primary-source-required (Form D, press release, or verified founder/firm post) — filters re-announcements and rumored rounds. Per round: lead, size, valuation if disclosed, what they do, why now, and the sharpest risk. Triggers: "this week in funding", "deal flow", "who raised this week", "crypto funding rounds", "AI funding tracker".

77

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, highly actionable instruction skill: concrete inputs, named sources, an explicit output template, and sharp quality rules with no wasted tokens. Its only gap is that the multi-step gather→filter→format→output workflow is implied by section ordering rather than stated as an explicit sequence.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every section earns its place with dense, directive prose ("Suppresses seed noise", "Show 'Filtered out' footer") and zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows; no padding anywhere in the 47-line body.

5 / 5

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it provides copy-paste-ready guidance: parameter table with defaults and an example value, named sources (SEC Form D, Crunchbase, TechCrunch funding tag), a concrete per-round output template, and rules with a negative example ("'AI is hot' is not a catalyst").

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (gather from sources → apply filters → fill per-round fields → group by vertical with filtered-out footer) is implied by section order and validation rules exist (the primary-source gate and the "Filtered out" footer), but the steps are never made explicit and there is no error-recovery guidance — matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external bundle files and no referenced paths needing verification; the well-organized section headers (Inputs, Sources, Filters, Per-round fields, Output, Rules) satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it states concrete actions in third person, defines a distinguishing primary-source gate, enumerates the output fields, and closes with five natural trigger phrases that explicitly answer when to use the skill. It is both concise and complete with no over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Weekly funding round tracker across configurable verticals" plus "filters re-announcements and rumored rounds" and a fully enumerated per-round output list (lead, size, valuation, what they do, why now, risk) give multiple concrete actions with comprehensive coverage; third-person voice is used throughout.

5 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is explicit (tracker, primary-source requirement, filters, per-round fields) and the "when" is explicit via the "Triggers:" clause with concrete quoted phrases, satisfying the 'Use when...' equivalent so the completeness cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Five natural trigger phrases ("this week in funding", "deal flow", "who raised this week", "crypto funding rounds", "AI funding tracker") cover the synonyms a user would actually say for this need, across multiple verticals; no natural variant is conspicuously missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Primary-source-required (Form D, press release, or verified founder/firm post)" carves out a clear niche in funding-round tracking with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
BankrBot/skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.