Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill: protocol-specific knowledge is inline, recipes are pushed one level deep to real reference files and hosted docs, and irreversible purchases are gated behind an explicit user-confirmation checkpoint. It loses points on minor token redundancies, reliance on task-time fetching for the purchase recipes themselves, and the absence of post-execution verification or error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
State the USDC 6-decimals fact once (keep it in 'Notes & gotchas' with the other numeric cautions) instead of repeating it in both the intro and the gotchas list.
Add a post-execution verification step to the workflow (e.g., confirm the ERC-721 ticket mint / transaction receipt and re-read getDrawingState to show the user their tickets landed), which would also add the feedback loop the workflow currently lacks.
Move the full referral parameter table (values, 1e18 split rules, opt-out handling) into a references/referrals.md and keep only the operator-wallet address and a one-line rule inline — the detail is only needed for purchase tasks, which already fetch task pages.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with protocol-specific facts Claude cannot know (addresses, 6-decimal USDC, per-task approval spenders, the >10-ticket revert) and never explains generic concepts, matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' — it is not 5 because the 6-decimals note appears in both the intro and the gotchas and the referral section repeats decision-tree material, and not 3 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanatory prose. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: exact contract addresses, exact hosted-doc URLs per intent, a copy-paste-ready referral parameter table with values, and per-task approval spenders — well above the pseudocode level of 3. It is not 5 because the actual transaction recipes are deferred to hosted pages and reference files fetched at task time, so the body alone does not cover the common purchase cases end-to-end; per the rubric's scoring notes, absence of code in an instruction-only router skill is not penalized when the guidance is actionable, which it is. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'How to use this skill' gives a clear 4-step sequence (match intent → fetch task page → execute via Bankr → confirm) and includes an explicit pre-sign checkpoint ("Confirm every write transaction with the user... show ticket count, total USDC cost, and which drawing"), which satisfies validation for the destructive/batch purchase operations so the cap at 3 does not apply. It is not 5 because there is no post-execution verification (e.g., checking the ticket mint/receipt after purchase) or error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine router/overview: a decision tree mapping each intent to either a local reference or a hosted task page, and a 'References in this skill' section giving a one-line description of each of the six bundle files — all of which were verified to exist and are exactly one level deep with no nested indirection. This matches 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split; easy navigation'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |