Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean CLI reference: fully executable commands, well-organized sections, and zero token waste. The only substantive gap is the lack of verification guidance before destructive or batch operations like delete and complete.
Suggestions
Add a note to run 'remindctl' or 'remindctl list <name>' first to confirm reminder/list IDs before running 'complete' or 'delete --force'.
Document whether 'remindctl list Work --delete' prompts for confirmation or is immediately destructive so batch mistakes can be avoided.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line is a runnable command or a one-line factual note (e.g. 'Quick add: `remindctl add "Buy milk"`'), with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | All guidance is copy-paste-ready with concrete arguments ('edit 1 --title "New title" --due 2026-01-04', 'delete 4A83 --force'), and the examples cover setup, permissions, viewing, CRUD, and output formats. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are logically ordered (Setup, Permissions, View, Manage), but destructive and batch operations ('delete 4A83 --force', 'list Work --delete', 'complete 1 2 3') have no validation steps such as confirming IDs via 'remindctl list' first, and the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 for such skills. Not 2: the sequence and command coverage are coherent, only checkpoints are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file, ~48-line skill with clean section headers and no content that warrants splitting into reference files, meeting the rubric's simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |