Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable reference: every action ships with an executable JSON example and the body is well organized with no concept padding. The only gap is the absence of validation/verification steps around destructive actions, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint before destructive actions (e.g. 'read' the message before 'delete', or confirm the messageId) so delete is not fired blind.
For batch operations (bulk delete, multi-channel search), note a validate-then-proceed feedback loop and how to handle partial failures.
Dedupe the repeated rules ('No markdown tables' and 'Mention users as <@USER_ID>') that appear in both Guidelines and Writing Style to tighten the body further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: concrete JSON payloads and tight bullet rules with no padding explaining Discord or basic concepts, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready JSON examples for every action (send, media, react, read, edit, delete, poll, pin, thread-create, search, set-presence) with the required fields filled in. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Actions are individually unambiguous, but destructive operations (e.g. 'delete') carry no validation or verification checkpoint, and the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2 when destructive changes lack feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; content is well-organized into clear single-level sections (Musts, Guidelines, Targets, Common Actions, Writing Style), satisfying the well-organized-sections anchor for a self-contained skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |