Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized simple-skill body with clear firing logic and good section structure. It could be tightened by trimming motivational prose and made more actionable by specifying how factual-assertion shapes are detected.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, but the 'Why this exists' and 'What you'll see' sections explain motivation the agent largely already grasps, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete specifics (30s grounding window, 8-fire cap, skip rules, implementation path) but only describes how 'factual-assertion shape' detection works rather than specifying it, leaving a key detail implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For this simple single-action interceptor, the fire sequence (detect ungrounded assertion → require memory_search → integrate → send) and skip conditions are unambiguous, with no destructive operation needing validation loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear sections; the single implementation path is a one-level pointer, not a nested reference chain. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |