Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized body for a simple built-in interceptor skill with excellent token efficiency and structure. Its main weakness is actionability: it documents what the interceptor does and where it lives, but omits activation and verification details that would make the guidance complete.
Suggestions
Add a short note on how the interceptor is activated or toggled (frontmatter shows always: false, but the body never explains what enables it) so readers know when it will actually be in effect.
Include a quick way to verify the re-route is working (e.g., an example memory_search call and the expected backend it lands on) to close the actionability gap.
Document the fallback behavior when the graph backend also misses, or when the relationship-shape detection misfires, so the pipeline has an explicit checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~150 words with zero padding: it explains only the non-obvious why ("the answer lives in entity relationships, not in chunk text") and the observable behavior change. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete details exist (the interceptor file path, "fires up to 12 times per session", and the watch→detect→extract→re-route mechanism), but there is no executable guidance and key operational details are missing — e.g., how the interceptor is activated given always: false, or how to verify it fired. Not 4 because nothing here is copy-paste executable; not 2 because the mechanism and implementation location are specifically stated. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single purpose (re-route relationship queries to the graph backend) is unambiguous and the internal pipeline is clearly sequenced in prose. It stops short of 5 because there is no checkpoint or fallback guidance for misfires (e.g., what happens when detection is wrong), though no destructive/batch cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well under 50 lines, has no bundle files, and needs none: the three short sections (intro, What you'll see, Implementation) are well-organized with no nested or buried references, matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |