blazemeter-getting-started
Getting started guides for BlazeMeter, including onboarding, migration guides, continuous testing journey, glossary, and mobile testing. Use when getting started with BlazeMeter for (1) Navigating BlazeMeter University onboarding, (2) Migrating from Runscope or JMeter, (3) Understanding the continuous testing journey, (4) Referencing BlazeMeter terminology, (5) Testing mobile sites and apps, or any other getting started tasks.
79
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
89%
1.53xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./resources/skills/blazemeter-getting-started/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that follows the pattern of good examples closely. It provides specific capabilities, uses natural trigger terms including product names, explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it with a numbered list of scenarios, and is highly distinctive due to the BlazeMeter-specific focus.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: onboarding, migration guides, continuous testing journey, glossary, and mobile testing. Each is a distinct, identifiable capability. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (getting started guides covering onboarding, migration, continuous testing, glossary, mobile testing) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with numbered trigger scenarios and a catch-all for other getting started tasks). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'BlazeMeter', 'onboarding', 'migration', 'Runscope', 'JMeter', 'continuous testing', 'glossary', 'mobile testing', 'getting started'. Good coverage of specific product names and task-oriented terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive due to the specific product name 'BlazeMeter' and the 'getting started' scope. Mentions specific migration sources (Runscope, JMeter) and BlazeMeter University, making it clearly distinguishable from other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
42%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill has good progressive disclosure with clear references to detailed topic files, but suffers from significant verbosity and redundancy—the same categorization of topics (onboarding, migration, journey, glossary, mobile) is repeated three times across different sections. The MCP tools section provides useful but overly verbose guidance that could be condensed into a compact table. Actionability is moderate since it relies on tool descriptions rather than executable examples.
Suggestions
Eliminate redundancy by merging the 'Quick Start', 'Reference Files', and 'When to Use Each Reference' sections into a single concise reference table mapping topics to files and use cases.
Condense the MCP tools section into a compact table format (tool | action | required args | returns) instead of verbose bullet lists, and remove the 'When to Use MCP Tools' subsection which states obvious information.
Add a concrete example showing actual MCP tool invocation syntax or expected output to make the workflow more actionable and copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Significant redundancy throughout. The 'Quick Start' section, 'When to Use Each Reference' section, and 'Reference Files' section all repeat the same information in slightly different forms. The MCP tools section is verbose, listing every action/arg in a way that could be much more compact. The 'When to Use MCP Tools' subsection restates obvious use cases. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | The MCP tools section provides concrete tool names, actions, and required arguments, plus an example workflow with specific steps. However, there are no executable code examples or copy-paste ready commands—it's more descriptive than executable. The reference files delegate all actual content elsewhere. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Example Workflow' for exploring an account provides a clear sequence of steps, but lacks validation checkpoints or error handling. There's no guidance on what to do if a step fails or returns unexpected results. For a getting-started guide, the workflow is adequate but not robust. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-organized, one-level-deep references to specific topic files (getting-started.md, onboarding.md, migration.md, etc.). Each reference is clearly labeled with its purpose and linked appropriately. Navigation is straightforward. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- Blazemeter/bzm-mcp
- Commit
b76b703
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.