Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent operational content: dense, executable, and safe by design, with dry-run/confirm validation baked into every money-moving step and concrete error-recovery guidance. The single-file structure is well-organized but does not leverage progressive disclosure through reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~107-line body is lean throughout: every section (Mental model, Golden rules, Order semantics, Troubleshooting) carries operational facts Claude would not know, with zero padding or explanation of known concepts. Not 4 because there are no passages that could be trimmed without losing information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The end-to-end flow block gives copy-paste-ready commands ('blockrun_polymarket action:"buy" token_id:"..." amount_usd:2 confirm:true') covering the common cases — fund, buy, limit orders, cancel, positions, redeem, withdraw — with only dynamic ids as placeholders, which is unavoidable. Not 4 because the commands are directly executable and cover the common cases, not merely 'mostly' executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 0–8 sequence with explicit validation gating: 'Call once WITHOUT confirm → show the dry-run preview → ask → re-call with confirm:true', satisfying the destructive-operation validation requirement for real-money trades. The Troubleshooting section maps concrete error strings to corrective actions ('No deposit wallet configured' → run action:"setup"), providing feedback loops for error recovery. Not 4 because checkpoints and recovery paths are explicit and complete. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well-sectioned with clear headers and appropriate content placement; nothing that clearly belongs in a separate file is inlined. Not 5 because the ~100-line single-file skill exceeds the 'under 50 lines' case where organized sections alone earn a 5 — order-semantics or troubleshooting detail could plausibly live in reference files, so the structure is good but not the ideal reference-split example. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |