Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview with concrete commands and specific API/file references that mostly assume Claude's competence. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the scaffold-to-finish flow lacks explicit validation checkpoints, and some content could be offloaded to reference files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint in the Scaffolding and Finishing sections (e.g. 'After scaffolding, confirm the app appears under `pnpm dev` before branding it') to close the validation gap that caps workflow_clarity.
Provide one copy-paste-ready `defineAction` example with the `http: { method: "GET" }` read marker so the actions guidance is fully executable rather than identifier-only.
Move the PostgreSQL detail block into a `references/db.md` file referenced from the body, tightening the overview and strengthening progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what Postgres, React Router, or shadcn are, and uses concrete identifiers like `defineAction`, `APP_BASE_PATH`, and `appBasePath()`. It is not a 5 because a few rationale sentences (e.g. "Action-backed UI is what makes agent-created or agent-edited records appear without a manual refresh") could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — `pnpm exec agent-native create <app-name> --template=<template>`, `http: { method: "GET" }`, `useActionQuery`/`useActionMutation`, and specific file paths like `app/entry.client.tsx`. It is not a 5 because guidance is instruction-style with identifiers rather than complete copy-paste code blocks, and some directives ("Keep raw SQL for additive migrations") are descriptive rather than executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are sequenced as a logical flow (classify → locate → vault → discovery/UI → actions → DB → scaffold → finish) with a classification decision gate and a finishing do-not checklist. It is not a 4 because explicit validation/verification checkpoints in the scaffold→finish path are mostly implicit — there is no validate-then-proceed step for the DB or scaffolding work. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview split into clearly headed sections, with one-level-deep pointers ("Read `.agents/skills/shadcn-ui/SKILL.md`" and a Related Skills list) for detail. It is not a 5 because at ~95 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and relies on inline prose rather than a bundle-file split for some content that could live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |