Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is efficient, actionable, and well-structured with concrete tool names, a usable JSON example, a focused-edit prompt template, and explicit readback validation in the edit workflow. It sits solidly at the 4-anchor across all dimensions, held from 5 by minor over-explanation and a few implicit checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instructive with no padding about what apps or MCP are; a few host-enumeration sentences could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete open_app JSON, named tools (list_apps, view-screen, run-host-webmcp-tool, ask_app, get-deck), and a copy-paste focused-task prompt give mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps for the less-common tools. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear open → list → direct-tool-vs-ask_app → view-screen → readback sequence is present with a numbered edit checklist and explicit readback validation; not a 5 because a couple of checkpoints remain implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clear sections (Open the app, Work in Slides, Authentication, Failure handling) with no nested references; structure is good though there is nothing to point out to. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |