Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured reference that pairs a data model with an actionable task table; its only meaningful gap is the absence of validation/verification steps for the mutating operations it documents.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: each section is 1-4 lines, states concrete table/column facts, and assumes Claude's competence; the only slightly explanatory sentence (timezone on schedule, not user) earns its place by surfacing a non-obvious design decision rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete table/column names and a Common-tasks table mapping requests to specific commands ("add-date-override --scheduleId <id> --date 2026-04-10 --intervals []"), but ellipsis placeholders ("[...9-12, 13-17...]") and the vague "Insert a travel_schedules row (no dedicated action yet)" leave minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The request-to-action mapping is clear for a single action, but the skill mutates availability tables (batch/DB-like operations) with no validation or verification checkpoint, and the rubric caps workflow_clarity at 3 when destructive/batch operations lack validation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, requires no external references (none of references/scripts/assets exist), and is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Schedule, Weekly availability, Date overrides, Travel schedules, Out of office, Common tasks), meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |