Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete templates, naming rules, and specific cross-skill references, and it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. It is weakest on workflow sequencing (no explicit create-then-verify flow) and on practicing the progressive disclosure it preaches.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered 'Steps to create a skill' flow (interview → pick type → fill template → name → set scope → verify) with a final verification checkpoint so the process is sequenced rather than implied.
Either move the three skill-type templates into a references/ file (e.g. templates.md) and link to it, or explicitly justify keeping them inline, to align the skill with its own progressive-disclosure guidance.
Tighten the scope section and de-duplicate the repeated template frontmatter placeholder to reduce token weight while preserving the actionable core.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the three near-parallel templates repeat shared headings and the identical placeholder line, and the ~30-line scope section is more than the core task requires; it could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready markdown templates for each skill type, concrete naming rules ('[a-z0-9-], max 64 characters'), a file-structure tree, and specific cross-references (useDbSync, view-screen action, navigation state key) — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A reasonable order exists (When to Use → Interview → Templates → Naming → Scope), but the creation process is presented as a checklist rather than an explicit sequenced workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints to confirm a finished skill is well-formed. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-organized sections, but it recommends pushing depth into references/ without employing that pattern itself, and the three inline templates are content that could plausibly live in separate reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |