Conciseness

The body is a dense, lean reference with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (editor tabs, scheduling types, location kinds, custom fields, hashed links) earns its place, matching the score-3 anchor.

Actionability

It provides concrete, specific guidance — exact field names, enum values, the slug path '/d/:hash/:slug', and API hooks like 'add-private-link', 'expiresAt', and 'isSingleUse' — equivalent to copy-paste-ready reference detail rather than abstract description.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple, single-purpose reference (not a multi-step process); per the simple-skills note, its clearly organized sections qualify workflow_clarity for a 3 even without an explicit step sequence.

Progressive Disclosure

At under 50 lines with no external bundle files and well-organized sections, it meets the simple-skills criterion for a 3 on progressive disclosure with no nested-reference concerns.

Specificity

Names the domain ('event types') and several facets ('fields, scheduling types, tabs in the editor ... configurable options') but does not list multiple concrete actions, matching the score-2 anchor of naming a domain with some actions rather than a comprehensive action list.

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' (how event types work, fields, scheduling types, tabs, options) but provides no 'when/Use when' clause, so per the judging guidelines completeness is capped at 2.

Trigger Term Quality

'event types' is a natural keyword a user would say, but the description lacks common variations and broader trigger phrasing, fitting the score-2 anchor of some relevant keywords missing common variations.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'event types' is a reasonably specific scheduling-domain term unlikely to broadly conflict, but the thin trigger set means it could still overlap with adjacent scheduling skills, matching the score-2 anchor.