Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable reference: lean and token-efficient with executable code and clearly sequenced workflows. Its only weakness is progressive disclosure — the material is a single inline file rather than an overview pointing into split reference files.
Suggestions
For a skill this size, move the detailed Lifecycle, Permissions, and Context contract sections into referenced bundle files (e.g. LIFECYCLE.md, PERMISSIONS.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled links, lifting progressive_disclosure to 3.
Consolidate the scattered back-compat callouts (EmbeddedTool, toolClassName, tool_slots/toolFetch aliases) into a single "Legacy names" subsection so each is stated once, reducing repetition across sections.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint at the end of the authoring workflow (e.g. "list-extensions-for-slot to confirm the install") to make the feedback loop explicit even though the operation is non-destructive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what iframes, postMessage, Alpine.js, or polling are — and every section (tables, conventions, code) earns its tokens with no endorsement fluff, matching the lean score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: a complete Alpine.js HTML snippet, exact action invocations ("add-extension-slot-target { extensionId: ... slotId: ... }"), and a concrete TSX <ExtensionSlot> example, satisfying the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The authoring flow is a clear numbered 3-step sequence and the "Typical flow" section adds explicit conditional branching (install if it exists, otherwise create → target → install); the operations are reversible/per-user so the destructive-validation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and cross-references to sibling skills are clearly signaled one level deep, but the ~200-line body is monolithic with no bundle files and content (Lifecycle, Permissions, Context contract) that could be split into referenced files is kept inline, fitting the score-2 rather than the "content appropriately split" score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |