CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

integrations

Calendar + video provider integrations — Google Calendar, Office 365, Zoom, built-in video, Google Meet — and how to write new ones.

62

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/scheduling/docs/skills/integrations/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean and highly actionable, covering provider inventory, credential lifecycle, busy-time aggregation, common tasks, and Teams setup with concrete commands and failure paths. Its main weakness is a dangling reference to `docs/providers.md` that resolves to nothing in the bundle, weakening navigation for the provider-authoring workflow.

Suggestions

Either include `docs/providers.md` (or a `references/providers.md`) in the bundle and reference it with a clear relative link, or inline the minimal provider interface (the methods/shape `createTeamsProvider()` consumers must implement) so the "Writing a new provider" section is self-sufficient.

Show the full callback flow for Teams end-to-end — the exact `completeVideoOAuth()` arguments and a post-callback check that the `teams_video` credential became valid — since the section warns about the failure mode but not how to verify success.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line carries non-obvious domain facts (provider auth models, DB tables like `scheduling_credentials` and `booking_references`, cache TTL, tenant defaults, OAuth scopes) with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool invocations throughout (`connect-calendar --kind google_calendar --redirectUri ...`, `set-default-conferencing-app --credentialId <zoom-cred>`, `aggregateBusy({userEmail, rangeStart, rangeEnd})`) plus a user-phrase-to-action table; minor gaps remain in ellided arguments (`--redirectUri ...`) and unshown signatures (`completeVideoOAuth()`).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The credential lifecycle is a clearly numbered 1–5 sequence with an explicit failure-recovery checkpoint ("Token expires → refresh flow runs silently; on failure, set `invalid: true` and show re-connect banner"), and the Teams section flags the auth pitfall; validation after `completeVideoOAuth()` and the new-provider flow are left implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized in a ~65-line body, but the only deep reference, "See `docs/providers.md` for the full interface", points to a file not present in the skill bundle, leaving the "Writing a new provider" section a dead-end pointer rather than navigable content.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, naming concrete providers and the extension path, but it omits any trigger guidance. Adding an explicit "Use when..." clause and common synonyms (Teams, Outlook, meeting, scheduling) would raise it substantially.

Suggestions

Add a "Use when..." clause, e.g. "Use when the user wants to connect a calendar or video provider, reconnect an expired credential, or add a new integration."

Include missing natural synonyms users would say: Microsoft Teams, Outlook, video conferencing, meeting links, scheduling.

State one or two concrete actions per provider (e.g. "read free/busy, write events, create meetings") rather than the generic verb "integrations".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates specific providers ("Google Calendar, Office 365, Zoom, built-in video, Google Meet") plus a concrete capability ("how to write new ones"), but "integrations" is the only action verb and per-provider actions are not stated.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (calendar + video provider integrations and writing new ones), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases like "Calendar", "Google Calendar", "Office 365", "Zoom", and "Google Meet" give good keyword coverage, but common synonyms such as "Teams", "Outlook", "meeting", and "scheduling" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The specific provider names establish a distinct niche unlikely to trigger the wrong skill, with minor overlap risk against a generic Google Calendar or Zoom skill.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
BuilderIO/agent-native
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.