Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean reference skill: highly specific operational details, clear state-by-state mapping semantics, and appropriate bundle boundaries, with validation guidance built in. The only minor improvement would be one or two example invocations of the findings-* commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout — "Don't call these scripts directly. Use fragility-common's findings-doctor, findings-match, and findings-upsert" — with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates: exact script names, exit-code semantics ("Exit code 2 means Jira could not be reached... Never treat it as a pass"), --key formats ("ENG-123 or the browse URL"), plan naming (<plan>-<run>.md), and the "Relates" link type. The only gap is the absence of example invocations of the wrapper commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a reference skill its single directive (use the findings-* wrappers, never call scripts directly) is unambiguous, and validation checkpoints are present (findings-doctor credential/permission preflight, exit-code-2 handling), but there is no explicit end-to-end sequence, leaving it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single one-level-deep reference to scripts/jira.ts, which exists in the bundle; the 'don't call these scripts directly' boundary appropriately separates the doc from the code. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |