Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with strong workflow clarity, concrete commands, and appropriately delegated reference files, though it carries some over-explanation and inline content that could be further split out.
Suggestions
Trim the 'VibeCoder 向け' section's definitions of basic terms that Claude already knows, keeping only the anti-tampering reminder.
Move the detailed git-log flag reference table into a reference file, leaving a one-line pointer in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete git-log commands and tables, but the 'VibeCoder 向け' section over-explains basic terms ('CIが落ちた' = '自動テストが失敗している状態') and the ASCII diagrams add padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable git commands, a concrete Task-tool sub-agent launch pattern, and concrete prohibition examples (it.skip, continue-on-error, eslint-disable); core diagnostic detail is appropriately delegated to reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with a Step 0 quality gate, an explicit user-approval gate for test/config changes, an anti-tamper checklist, and a fix→rerun→escalate feedback loop after 2+ failures. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Two one-level-deep references (analyzing-failures.md, fixing-tests.md) are well-signaled in the feature table and both files exist; minor gaps as the git-log and VibeCoder sections could be split into references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |