Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong verification checkpoints, but it is a long single-file prompt whose detailed pattern catalog and tables could benefit from offloading into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the eight detection patterns (Phase 2) and the Phase 3/4 tables into a references/ file (e.g. PATTERNS.md), keeping SKILL.md as an overview with signaled links, to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim repetitive impact sentences in Phase 2 patterns to lift conciseness, since the fix examples already convey the stakes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — grep patterns, fix snippets, and severity tables earn their place rather than restating basic concepts — but the ~300-line body is lengthy and several impact explanations could be trimmed, so it sits at 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives exact grep regexes, per-match Read verification steps, and copy-paste-ready fixes (e.g. 'SKAction.run { [weak self] in self?.doThing() }'), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1–5 are explicitly sequenced with mandatory tool-use instructions, verify-before-report checkpoints ('use Read to verify the surrounding context before reporting'), a false-positive checklist, and a structured output format, matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the eight detection patterns plus the completeness/cross-reference tables all live inline in one large file that could reasonably be split into reference files, fitting 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |