CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

axiom-audit-storage

Use when the user mentions file storage issues, data loss, backup bloat, or asks to audit storage usage.

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./axiom-codex/skills/axiom-audit-storage/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, highly operational audit procedure: exact search patterns, executable fixes, a verify-before-report loop, compound-severity cross-referencing, and a concrete output contract. The main weaknesses are minor redundancy in the tool-use mandate and invocation examples, and references to companion skill files that are not clearly signaled or bundled.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — exact grep patterns, severity tables, tunable thresholds, and anti-drift corrections like 'There is no synchronous per-change plist rewrite to look for'. Minor trimming opportunities remain: the tool-use mandate is restated three ways, the five Invocation Examples are near-identical, and the Scope section repeats the frontmatter description — matching 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the lean level-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every pattern ships exact grep patterns, executable fix code (e.g., 'try data.write(to: url, options: [.atomic, .completeFileProtection])' and the setResourceValues shadowing snippet), a graphviz location decision tree, a complete output-format template, health-scoring criteria, and output limits. This matches 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Phases 1-5 are clearly sequenced, each detection pattern follows a Search-Verify-Fix loop with explicit verification ('use Read to verify the surrounding context before reporting'), the Storage Map must be presented before proceeding, and False Positives plus Output Limits handle edge cases. This matches the level-5 anchor with explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery guidance; as a read-only audit it is not subject to the destructive-operation cap.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A well-organized single-file skill (no references/scripts/assets bundle exists) with clear section headers and one-level-deep pointers to related skills ('axiom-data (skills/storage.md)', 'axiom-security (skills/file-protection-ref.md)'). It falls short of the level-5 anchor because those pointers are not clearly signaled as links and some reference-shaped material (the decision tree, cross-auditor overlap notes) is inlined in a ~320-line file rather than split out.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

47%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has solid natural trigger phrases and a distinct storage-audit niche, but it is missing the 'what' half entirely — a reader cannot tell what the skill does when invoked. Adding a concrete capability statement (e.g., detecting wrong storage locations, missing backup exclusions, and missing file protection) would lift both completeness and specificity substantially.

Suggestions

Add a 'what' clause before the trigger clause listing concrete capabilities, e.g.: 'Detects files in wrong iOS storage locations, missing backup exclusions, missing file protection, and large UserDefaults payloads. Use when...'

Broaden trigger coverage with natural synonyms users actually say, such as 'disk space', 'storage full', 'iCloud backup too large', or 'files disappearing'.

Since the body audits iOS-specific storage (Documents/, Caches/, Keychain, App Groups), consider signaling the platform in the description to sharpen distinctiveness and trigger accuracy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("file storage issues") and a single generic action ("audit storage usage") but never states what the skill actually does — no mention of detecting wrong locations, missing backup exclusions, or missing file protection. It matches the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' rather than the level-3 anchor, which requires concrete listed actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

The description is entirely a 'when' clause ("Use when the user mentions...") with no 'what' — it never says what the skill does. This exactly matches the anchor 'only when is present without what'; it cannot score 3 because a clear 'what' is absent, not merely weakly implied.

2 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"file storage issues", "data loss", "backup bloat", and "audit storage usage" are natural phrases users would say, but common variations are missing ("disk space", "storage full", "iCloud backup too large", "files disappearing"). Good coverage with a few natural terms missing, matching the level-4 anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers like "backup bloat", "data loss", and "audit storage usage" carve a fairly distinct storage-audit niche with only minor overlap risk against generic disk-cleanup or database-storage skills. Mostly distinct with minor overlap, matching the level-4 anchor.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom

Path

axiom-codex/skills/axiom-audit-storage/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.