Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-engineered audit skill: a clear five-phase workflow with mandatory tool use, explicit grep→Read verification, severity escalation rules, and a health-score rubric. The only real lever is token efficiency — some inline catalogs could be trimmed or externalized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and actionable — concrete grep patterns and fix snippets with no padding about what SwiftUI/NavigationStack is — but the ~250 lines have minor redundancy between Phase 2's 10 anti-patterns and Phase 3's completeness questions, keeping it just below the lean level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, runnable Grep patterns (e.g. '.navigationDestination(for:', 'NavigationStack {') and copy-pasteable fix snippets (e.g. '@State private var path = NavigationPath()'); it is not a 5 because several fixes are one-liners without full surrounding context for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-phase workflow (Map → Detect → Reason → Cross-Reference → Score) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('For every grep match, use Read to verify the surrounding context before reporting'), a required Phase 1 output map, a Phase 5 scoring rubric, output limits, and a false-positives checklist — matching the level-5 anchor's explicit validation steps and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-structured into labeled phases/sections with no nested or buried references, and no bundle files exist to misorganize; it is not a 5 because everything is inlined in one ~250-line file with no one-level-deep references deferring the detailed pattern catalog or output templates. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |