Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced debugging workflow with strong feedback loops. It loses points on token efficiency (redundant restated triage) and progressive disclosure (monolithic body, missing referenced bundle files).
Suggestions
De-duplicate the failure triage that appears in the failure-pattern table, the Error Quick Reference, and the Decision Tree — keep one canonical source and cross-reference it.
Move the xcsym crash-triage table and the pattern reference into a real reference file (e.g. references/xcsym-ref.md) and link to it, so the referenced path actually exists and the body stays a lean overview.
Split the large failure-pattern / fix recipe tables into a reference doc and keep SKILL.md as the phased overview + decision tree.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable and assumes Claude's competence, but ~322 lines with restated triage across the failure-pattern table, Error Quick Reference, and Decision Tree could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Executable xcodebuild/xcresulttool/xcsym commands and concrete BEFORE/AFTER Swift fixes are copy-paste ready, with only minor <SCHEME_NAME> placeholders. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-phase RUN→CAPTURE→ANALYZE→SUGGEST→FIX→VERIFY→REPORT loop with an explicit verify re-run, max-3-iteration escalation, and a decision tree. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No references/scripts/assets bundle files exist, so the body is a monolithic >50-line document; pointers like 'skills/xcsym-ref.md' reference no real file and there is no content split for discovery. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |