CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

axiom-swiftui

Use when building, fixing, or improving ANY SwiftUI UI — views, navigation, layout, animations, performance, architecture, gestures, debugging, iOS 26 features.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured router skill: concrete, actionable routing with clear diagnostic sequencing and escalation feedback loops, and exemplary progressive disclosure. The main weakness is redundancy between the Quick Reference table and the Decision Tree, which cover the same symptom-to-file mappings.

Suggestions

Collapse the Decision Tree and Quick Reference table into a single routing structure (or make the dot graph a compact summary that links to the table) to remove the duplicated symptom-to-file mappings.

De-duplicate the auditor-launch guidance that appears in both the Quick Reference rows and the Automated Scanning section, keeping one canonical location.

The 'You MUST use this skill for ANY SwiftUI work...' line restates the description's over-claim; consider softening it so the body reinforces the description rather than repeating it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Decision Tree (dot graph) duplicates the Quick Reference table's symptom-to-file mappings, and the Automated Scanning section overlaps the auditor launches — two parallel routing structures that could be collapsed.

2 / 3

Actionability

Routing guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready: exact agent names ('Launch swiftui-architecture-auditor'), exact slash commands ('/axiom:audit swiftui-performance'), and exact file paths; an instruction-only router need not supply code when guidance is this actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The decision tree gives clear diagnostic sequencing, and the 'still broken after debugging -> debugging-diag.md' / 'nav -> nav-diag.md' pattern is an explicit escalation feedback loop; the numbered Conflict Resolution sequence adds a try-first-then-escalate flow.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a pure overview routing to one-level-deep, well-signaled references via the Quick Reference table and 'See skills/X.md' pointers, with no nested 2+ level chains; the cross-suite references are explicitly flagged ('Homed in another suite') rather than broken.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A high-quality description: it pairs an explicit 'Use when' trigger with concrete actions and a comprehensive list of natural SwiftUI domain terms, all in third-person imperative voice. It is distinctive and unlikely to fire for non-SwiftUI work.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('building, fixing, or improving') and concrete sub-domains ('views, navigation, layout, animations, performance, architecture, gestures, debugging, iOS 26 features'), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicit 'Use when ...' clause supplies the trigger (when) while the enumerated actions and domains supply the what; the guideline only caps at 2 when a 'Use when' clause is missing, and it is present.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural developer-facing terms ('SwiftUI UI', 'views', 'navigation', 'layout', 'animations', 'gestures', 'debugging', 'iOS 26') are exactly what a user would say when needing this skill, giving good coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to SwiftUI with a distinct niche and trigger; the imperative 'Use when' form is the canonical third-person trigger, not second person, so no voice penalty applies.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
CharlesWiltgen/Axiom
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.