Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable guide with a concrete command, clear preflight and error-handling steps, and sensible safety constraints around a destructive-capable tool. It is well-structured for a short single-purpose skill with no bundle files needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence: a single copy-ready command plus tight error/auth/permission guidance, with no padding explaining what Kimi Code is or basic concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete copy-paste command (`kimi -p "<prompt>" --output-format stream-json`), explicit preflight (`command -v kimi`), JSONL parsing instructions, and a concrete example walkthrough covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (set dir/timeout, check availability, run once and exit) with validation checkpoints (nonzero exit or error event = failure, inspect the diff afterward) and a retry-once feedback loop; falls just short of a full checklist for a destructive-capable runner. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (## Run, ## Authentication And Permissions), matching the simple-skill exception where clean organization alone scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |