Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable routing skill with excellent progressive disclosure and concrete commands. Its main weakness is verbosity in the Product Demand and interaction-contract sections, which could be tightened for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Tighten the Product Demand gate and Interaction/interruption contract prose by converting explanatory sentences into terse rules; remove restated categories to cut tokens.
Inline the validate->fix->retry loop for applied fixes instead of only referencing AGENTS.md, so the workflow's feedback loop is self-contained.
Collapse duplicated authority-model phrasing (the Route section restates fix/submit flag handling already covered in the Authority model section).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and operational without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but several sections (Product Demand gate, interaction contract) carry explanatory prose and repetition that could be tightened beyond a minor trim. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: concrete git/pnpm commands, explicit thresholds (CHANGED_LINES <= 1000, CHANGED_FILES <= 20), a concrete routing table, and explicit anti-patterns like "Never `pnpm test <path>`". | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear ordered stages and first-match routing with explicit validation rules and authority gates, but the validate-fix-retry feedback loop is partly delegated to an external AGENTS.md section rather than fully inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview pointing to 10 verified one-level-deep reference files, each explicitly signaled by path in tables and prose, with the stages table declared as the single source of truth for navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |