Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally token-efficient and actionable with real commands and templates. The main gap is the absence of an explicit error-handling/retry feedback loop for the batch submission and create operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit failure-retry loop for `gh issue create` and the batch flow (e.g., on failure: surface the error, fix, retry; only mark a report '已提交 #号' after a confirmed successful create).
Spell out the per-item validation in the batch path as a checklist (read → filter 待提交 → dedup → preview → confirm → submit → update status) with a checkpoint between dedup and submit.
Clarify what counts as a 'duplicate' from `gh search issues` and how to proceed when duplicates are found (link to existing vs. still file new), to remove ambiguity in the dedup step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and arrow-compressed, assumes Claude's competence, and explains no concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, copy-pasteable commands (gh auth status, gh search issues, gh issue create), real template file paths, and a concrete markdown archive template — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequences for both modes are clearly ordered with an explicit pre-submit confirmation checkpoint, but the batch operation and submission lack an explicit validate/retry feedback loop for failures, which caps clarity at 2 per the batch-operation guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single ~33-line file with well-organized sections; per the under-50-lines guideline, that is sufficient for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |