Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable auditing guide that respects token budget and offloads snippets to a real reference file. Tightening the redundant explanatory comments would push conciseness to a 5.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory comments that restate what the code already shows (e.g., 'This efficiently extracts the selector and snippet of failing elements without loading the full report into context').
Consider adding an explicit verify/retry loop for at least one workflow (e.g., after fixing contrast or tap-target issues, re-run the snippet to confirm the violation cleared) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Move or hyperlink the contrast snippet's caveat about injecting axe-core for production audits to keep the inline guidance lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with skill-specific, non-obvious tips (opacity vs display:none behavior, the .md.txt URL trick); a few comments like the jq/node explanation state what the tool already shows and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool names with parameter values, an executable node one-liner, and named pointers to copy-paste-ready snippets in the reference; minor gaps only because some snippets live in the bundled file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced patterns with numbered steps and implicit checkpoints (score<1 indicates violations, modal focus trapping); not a crisp validate->fix->retry loop but the skill is read-only auditing so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview sections with JavaScript snippets appropriately split into a single one-level-deep reference file (a11y-snippets.md, verified present) and clearly signaled via named snippet links. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |