Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable MCP tool guide: concrete tool names, parameters, flags, and a copy-paste config, with clear ordered workflows and verification steps in the extension testing flow. Weaknesses are minor — a couple of trimmable phrases, a typo, and no failure-handling guidance after verification steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and tool-focused with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., "Use `take_snapshot` to get page structure with element `uid`s"). A few phrases could be trimmed ("Treat the output as authoritative and complete.") and there is a typo ("Addional"), so it is efficient with minor instances of over-explanation rather than the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance for an MCP-tool skill: exact tool names and parameters (`pageId`, `filePath`, `includeSnapshot: false`, `pageIdx`/`pageSize`), CLI flags (`--categoryExtensions`, `--memoryDebugging`), a copy-paste JSON server config, and specific service-worker evaluation instructions. As an instruction-only skill, the guidance is concrete and covers the common cases, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequences with explicit ordering ("navigate → wait → snapshot → interact") and a 5-step extension workflow that includes verification steps ("Verify Service Worker", "Verify Page Behavior") plus an error-recovery hint ("If an element isn't found, take a fresh snapshot"). Below anchor 5 because there is no guidance on what to do when a verification step fails; above anchor 3 because checkpoints are present and explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body (~70 lines) is well-organized into Core Concepts, Workflow Patterns, and Troubleshooting with external links clearly signaled and grouped in Troubleshooting. All inline content belongs inline, but the body slightly exceeds the under-50-line threshold where good sections alone earn a 5, so anchor 4's 'good structure, minor organization gaps' is the closest fit. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |