Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured, with executable commands covering all subcommands and real output examples. Minor conciseness trimming and an explicit error-recovery loop would lift it further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, purposeful body with executable commands and skimmable sections; a few prose blocks ('Why This Exists', performance attribution) could be trimmed but largely earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Full CLI reference with copy-paste-ready commands for every subcommand plus real example outputs (result.json, report.md excerpt), fully executable and covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Validate → Run → Open → Demo-fallback sequence with explicit input validation (BED >=4 cols, BAM .bai); falls short of 5 only in lacking an explicit run-failure feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview SKILL.md with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real bundle files (polars_primer.md, file_io.md, etc.); content appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |