Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands, MCP calls, and templates organized into a clear 7-phase workflow. Its weakest point is conciseness — the long body could be tightened and some inline detail could move to the referenced files.
Suggestions
Trim redundant 'Goal:' scaffolding and consolidate the auto-discovery find/grep commands to reduce length.
Move the full report template and estimation-formula table into reference files, keeping only a compact example inline, to improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Phase 2 (e.g., 'verify inventory is complete before mapping dimensions') to lift workflow clarity toward a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly action-dense but runs long (~440 lines) with padded 'Goal:' labels, repeated phase scaffolding, and some explanation that could be tightened; it sits at 'mostly efficient but could be tighter'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash find/grep commands, concrete MCP call signatures with parameters, executable WebSearch/WebFetch examples, estimation formulas, and a full report template covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven phases are clearly sequenced with goals and feedback loops (confirm dimension values exist, ask user for unresolved variables, fall back to estimates on query failure); minor validation gaps keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-signaled, one-level-deep references in 'See Also' and inline (service-mapping.md, best-practices.md, output-examples.md, etc.); the body is fairly long with inline detail (formula table, full report template) that keeps it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |