course

显示 python-office 库的使用教程、群组信息、源码地址等。当用户提到 python-office 介绍、查看课程、帮助信息、资源链接时使用。

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, single-purpose skill whose body is tight, fully executable, and well-sectioned with no padding. It maximally fits the rubric's simple-skill carve-outs across conciseness, actionability, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a short, well-organized reference (功能描述, 调用方式, 参数说明, 返回值, 使用示例, 原始函数) with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	It provides a complete, copy-paste-ready executable example (from office.skills.tools import course; course()) plus explicit 参数说明 and 返回值, leaving no ambiguity about how to call it.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	This is a simple single-action skill with an unambiguous invocation, so per the simple-skills note the single clear action meets the workflow-clarity bar of 3; no destructive/batch operation requires validation checkpoints.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	At under 50 lines with no need for external references (no references/scripts/assets bundles exist) and clean section organization, the structure satisfies the simple-skill progressive-disclosure criterion of 3.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific to a single named library and explicitly pairs a 'what' with a 'when' trigger clause. Trigger-term coverage and action specificity are adequate but not exhaustive, so it sits at the strong end of the middle tier overall.

Suggestions

Expand trigger terms with natural variations users might actually say (e.g., 'python-office 怎么用', 'POffice 教程', '加群/QQ群', 'GitHub 源码') to lift trigger_term_quality toward 3.

Reframe the displayed items as concrete actions (e.g., '展示使用教程、列出群组入口、提供源码链接') instead of nouns, to push specificity from 2 toward 3.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (python-office library) and concrete nouns (使用教程、群组信息、源码地址) but lists things-to-display rather than distinct concrete actions, so it is 'domain and some actions' rather than 'multiple specific concrete actions'.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states the 'what' (显示 python-office 库的使用教程、群组信息、源码地址) and an explicit 'when' clause (当用户提到…时使用), satisfying both halves with explicit trigger guidance.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	It lists user-sayable phrases ('python-office 介绍、查看课程、帮助信息、资源链接') but misses common variations and relies on one term family, so coverage is partial rather than comprehensive.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Tied to a single named library (python-office) with library-specific triggers, giving it a clear niche unlikely to conflict with unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: CoderWanFeng/python-office
Path: skills/tools/course/SKILL.md
Commit: 2b1996b

Reviewed: about 17 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.