Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tidy, well-organized simple skill with executable code and a clear parameter table. Its main gap is the absence of any validation or verification for this batch operation, which the rubric caps at 3 for workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after the split (e.g., list/count generated files, confirm each sheet produced one output file) to satisfy the batch-operation validation requirement and lift workflow clarity above 3.
Clarify output naming (how generated files are named per sheet) and document overwrite/empty-sheet behavior to close the actionability gap.
Remove the redundant opening blockquote or merge the duplicate 调用方式 and 使用示例 code blocks to tighten conciseness toward a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean sections with no over-explanation of Excel concepts, though the opening blockquote repeats the 功能描述 sentence and the 调用方式/使用示例 code blocks are near-duplicates. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready import and call with a typed parameter table, but omits output-naming details and error/overwrite behavior. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single batch action is unambiguous but lacks any validation/verification (no output-existence check, empty-sheet handling, or overwrite warning); the batch-operation cap limits this to 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with clear section headers and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |