Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, executable, and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with concrete command examples and clear success criteria. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit validate/retry feedback loop, which keeps workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it states the key fact, a command signature, flag list, supported types, and success criteria with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a fully executable command signature with concrete flags, a copy-paste-ready generated-chart example, and explicit success criteria, covering the common cases with specific, runnable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Required Workflow lists a clear sequence (confirm file exists -> run upload-media -> report artifactId) with a guardrail to verify the artifactId was returned, but there is no explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop, so it sits just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external bundle files; content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Key Fact, When To Use, Command, Success Criteria, Guardrails), which per the rubric's simple-skill exception scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |