CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

anchor-browser-automation

Automate Anchor Browser tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

59

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./composio-skills/anchor-browser-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-organized, lean, and provides concrete executable RUBE_* call patterns, but its batch/multi-execute workflows lack explicit result-validation and error-recovery feedback loops, capping workflow clarity. Progressive disclosure is strong given the self-contained single-purpose scope.

Suggestions

Add a post-execution validation step for batch RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL calls (e.g., inspect each tool result status, handle partial failures, retry failed items) to establish a proper feedback loop and lift workflow clarity above the batch-operations cap.

De-duplicate the 'always search tools first' guidance so it appears once authoritatively (e.g., in Known Pitfalls) rather than three times, tightening conciseness.

Provide a minimal end-to-end worked example showing a real tool_slug and session lifecycle so the placeholders become concrete for the common case.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, assumes Claude knows MCP concepts, and uses concrete call blocks, but the "always search tools first" message is repeated across Prerequisites, Tool Discovery, and Known Pitfalls, which is minor redundancy that could be trimmed — efficient with minor instances of over-explanation.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete RUBE_* tool calls with parameter structures and a Quick Reference table give mostly executable guidance; placeholders like TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH and your_session_id are justified by the explicitly dynamic schemas, leaving only minor gaps versus copy-paste readiness.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Setup and the Core Workflow Pattern (Steps 1-3) are clearly sequenced with a pre-execution connection-ACTIVE checkpoint, but the skill involves batch operations (RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL, bulk ops, pagination) with no post-execution validation or result/error-recovery feedback loop, which per the batch-operations cap limits workflow_clarity to 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single-purpose integration with no need for external references; content is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (Prerequisites, Setup, Tool Discovery, Core Workflow, Known Pitfalls, Quick Reference) with one appropriate external docs link, qualifying for the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific to a named toolkit and uses natural trigger terms with a clear "what", but it lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, which caps completeness. Distinctiveness is strong due to the product-specific naming.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when ...' clause naming the situations that should trigger this skill (e.g., 'Use when automating Anchor Browser sessions, scraping, or browser workflows via Composio').

Replace the generic 'Automate Anchor Browser tasks' with 1-2 concrete operations (e.g., 'drive Anchor Browser sessions, run browser workflows, and manage connections') to lift specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain concretely ("Anchor Browser tasks via Rube MCP (Composio)") and one concrete behavioral action ("search tools first for current schemas"), but the main verb "Automate ... tasks" is generic rather than enumerating specific operations, matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear ("Automate Anchor Browser tasks via Rube MCP"), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance — the second sentence is a behavioral instruction, not a when-to-use trigger, so per the missing-trigger cap completeness cannot exceed 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Anchor Browser", "Rube MCP", and "Composio" are natural terms a user would say when needing this skill, giving good keyword coverage; only minor variations/synonyms are missing, so it sits above the midpoint but short of comprehensive synonym coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Anchor Browser" is a specific named toolkit accessed via a specific MCP, giving a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills

Path

composio-skills/anchor-browser-automation/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.