apipie-ai-automation

Automate Apipie AI tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/apipie-ai-automation/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

22%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is too vague to effectively guide skill selection. It names specific tools/platforms but fails to explain what tasks can be automated or when this skill should be chosen. The lack of concrete actions and explicit trigger conditions makes it difficult for Claude to know when to select this skill over others.

Suggestions

Add specific concrete actions this skill enables (e.g., 'Create API integrations, manage workflows, connect services').

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms users would naturally say (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Apipie, Composio integrations, or needs to connect AI services').

Replace 'automate tasks' with specific task types this skill handles to improve both specificity and distinctiveness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description uses vague language like 'automate tasks' without specifying what concrete actions can be performed. 'Always search tools first' is procedural guidance, not a capability description.	1 / 3
Completeness	The 'what' is extremely vague ('automate tasks') and there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent guidance on when Claude should select this skill. The second sentence is implementation guidance, not trigger criteria.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some relevant keywords ('Apipie AI', 'Rube MCP', 'Composio') but these are technical/product names rather than natural terms users would say. Missing common variations or task-oriented triggers.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The specific product names (Apipie AI, Rube MCP, Composio) provide some distinctiveness, but 'automate tasks' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other automation-related skills.	2 / 3
	Total	6 / 12 Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill that efficiently guides Claude through Apipie AI automation via Rube MCP. The workflow is clear with proper validation checkpoints, and the content respects token budget. The main weakness is that tool call examples use placeholder syntax rather than fully concrete examples, which slightly reduces immediate actionability.

Suggestions

Provide at least one complete, concrete example with actual tool slugs and real argument values (even if hypothetical) to demonstrate the full pattern end-to-end

Consider adding a brief example of handling pagination tokens mentioned in Known Pitfalls to make that guidance more actionable

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Apipie AI is or how APIs work.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete tool call patterns with specific parameters, but the examples are pseudocode-like structures rather than fully executable code. The argument placeholders and comments like '/* schema-compliant args from search results */' reduce copy-paste readiness.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Clear 3-step workflow with explicit sequencing (discover → check connection → execute). Includes validation checkpoint ('Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows') and the Known Pitfalls section provides error prevention guidance.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to toolkit docs is one level deep and clearly signaled. Quick reference table provides efficient navigation for common operations.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Commit: 2790447

Reviewed: 29 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.