backendless-automation
Automate Backendless tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills --skill backendless-automationOverall
score
61%
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too vague to effectively guide skill selection. It names specific products but fails to explain what concrete actions are possible or when Claude should select this skill. The lack of specific capabilities and explicit trigger conditions makes it difficult to distinguish from other automation-related skills.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions (e.g., 'Create database tables, manage user authentication, deploy cloud functions in Backendless')
Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Backendless, backend-as-a-service, or needs to manage Backendless databases and APIs')
Include natural language terms users might say when needing this skill, such as 'backend setup', 'database management', 'cloud functions', or 'BaaS'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Automate Backendless tasks' without specifying what concrete actions can be performed. No specific capabilities are listed beyond generic 'tasks'. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is extremely vague ('Automate Backendless tasks') and there is no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance. The instruction to 'search tools first' is operational guidance, not a trigger condition. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains some relevant keywords ('Backendless', 'Rube MCP', 'Composio') but these are technical/product names rather than natural terms users would say. Missing common variations or task-oriented triggers. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The specific product names (Backendless, Rube MCP, Composio) provide some distinctiveness, but 'automate tasks' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other automation skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
73%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is well-structured and concise, effectively teaching the Rube MCP workflow pattern for Backendless automation. Its main weaknesses are the pseudo-code style examples that aren't fully executable and the lack of explicit validation/error handling steps integrated into the workflow. The quick reference table and pitfalls section add practical value.
Suggestions
Convert pseudo-code examples to fully executable tool calls with realistic example values instead of placeholders like 'your_session_id'
Add explicit validation steps to the Core Workflow Pattern, such as 'If connection is not ACTIVE, stop and complete auth' after Step 2
Include an example of handling a failed tool execution or error response in the workflow
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of basic concepts. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Backendless or Composio are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with field names, but uses pseudo-code style rather than fully executable examples. The argument structures show placeholders like 'your_session_id' and comments rather than complete, copy-paste ready examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (discover → check connection → execute), but lacks explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery guidance. The 'Known Pitfalls' section mentions checking connection status but doesn't integrate validation into the workflow steps themselves. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections, a quick reference table, and external link to toolkit docs. Content is appropriately sized for a single file with no need for additional references, and navigation is straightforward. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
91%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.