Automate Beaconstac tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
67
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/beaconstac-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too vague to effectively guide skill selection. It names the platform (Beaconstac) but fails to explain what specific tasks can be automated or when Claude should choose this skill. The operational instruction about searching tools first doesn't help with skill selection.
Suggestions
Add specific capabilities: list concrete Beaconstac actions like 'create QR codes', 'manage digital business cards', 'track analytics', or 'update campaigns'
Add explicit trigger guidance: 'Use when the user mentions Beaconstac, QR code campaigns, digital business cards, or proximity marketing'
Include natural user terms: add keywords users would actually say like 'QR codes', 'business cards', 'NFC tags', or 'beacon marketing'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Automate Beaconstac tasks' without specifying what concrete actions can be performed. No specific capabilities are listed beyond generic 'tasks'. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is extremely vague ('automate tasks') and there is no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance. The instruction to 'search tools first' is operational guidance, not a usage trigger. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Beaconstac', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' as domain-specific terms, but lacks natural user language. Users likely wouldn't say 'Rube MCP' or 'Composio' - they'd mention QR codes, digital business cards, or specific Beaconstac features. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'Beaconstac' provides some distinctiveness as a specific platform, but 'automate tasks via MCP' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other Composio/MCP-based automation skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently teaches Beaconstac automation through Rube MCP. The workflow is clear with proper validation steps, and the content respects token budget by avoiding unnecessary explanations. The main weakness is that tool call examples are structural templates rather than fully executable examples with realistic parameter values.
Suggestions
Provide at least one complete, realistic example with actual Beaconstac-specific parameters (e.g., creating a QR code or managing a campaign) rather than generic placeholders
Show a concrete example response from RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS to illustrate what 'schema-compliant args' look like in practice
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of basic concepts. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Beaconstac or Composio are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with specific parameter structures, but the examples are pseudo-code style rather than fully executable. The tool calls show structure but lack complete, copy-paste ready examples with realistic values. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step workflow with explicit sequence (discover → check connection → execute). Includes validation checkpoint (verify ACTIVE status before executing) and the Known Pitfalls section provides error prevention guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to toolkit docs is one level deep and clearly signaled. Quick reference table provides efficient navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
2790447
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.