bench-automation
Automate Bench tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
67
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/bench-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too vague to effectively guide skill selection. It names specific tools (Bench, Rube MCP, Composio) but fails to explain what tasks can be automated, what capabilities are available, or when this skill should be triggered. The procedural instruction about searching tools is implementation detail rather than useful selection criteria.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions that can be performed (e.g., 'Create tasks, manage projects, sync data between Bench and other services').
Include a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms users would say (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Bench, Composio integration, or needs to automate project management tasks').
Briefly explain what Bench is for users unfamiliar with the product, to improve trigger matching.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Automate Bench tasks' without specifying what concrete actions are performed. 'Search tools first for current schemas' is procedural guidance, not a capability description. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is extremely vague ('Automate Bench tasks') and there is no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance explaining when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains some relevant keywords ('Bench', 'Rube MCP', 'Composio') but these are technical/product-specific terms. Missing natural language variations users might say when needing this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The specific product names (Bench, Rube MCP, Composio) provide some distinctiveness, but 'automate tasks' is generic enough to potentially conflict with other automation skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently teaches Bench automation via Rube MCP. It excels at workflow clarity with explicit validation steps and provides good progressive disclosure. The main weakness is that examples are structural templates rather than fully executable code, though this is partially justified by the dynamic nature of tool discovery.
Suggestions
Consider adding a complete end-to-end example showing actual tool slugs and arguments returned from a real RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call to make the workflow more concrete
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Bench or MCP are. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with specific parameters, but uses pseudocode-style examples rather than fully executable code. The examples show structure but aren't copy-paste ready since they depend on dynamic values from prior steps. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step workflow with explicit sequence (discover → check connection → execute). Includes validation checkpoint (verify ACTIVE status before executing) and the Known Pitfalls section provides error recovery guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to toolkit docs is one level deep and clearly signaled. Quick reference table aids navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
- Commit
2790447
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.