benchmark-email-automation
Automate Benchmark Email tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
67
53%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./composio-skills/benchmark-email-automation/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too vague and technical to effectively guide skill selection. It fails to specify what email actions are supported and provides no guidance on when Claude should use this skill. The reliance on product-specific jargon without natural user terms makes it difficult for Claude to match user requests.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions: 'Send emails, manage contacts, create campaigns, track analytics' instead of generic 'tasks'
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms: 'Use when the user mentions Benchmark Email, email campaigns, email marketing, or Composio email integration'
Include common user language variations alongside technical terms to improve matching
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Automate Benchmark Email tasks' without specifying what concrete actions are possible (e.g., send emails, read inbox, manage contacts). 'Tasks' is abstract and non-descriptive. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is extremely vague ('tasks') and there is no 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance. The instruction to 'search tools first' is implementation detail, not usage guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains some relevant keywords ('Benchmark Email', 'Rube MCP', 'Composio') but these are technical/product-specific terms rather than natural user language. Missing common variations like 'email', 'send message', 'inbox'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The specific product names 'Benchmark Email', 'Rube MCP', and 'Composio' provide some distinctiveness, but 'email tasks' could overlap with other email-related skills. The niche is somewhat defined by the tool names. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill that efficiently guides Claude through Benchmark Email automation via Rube MCP. The workflow is clear with proper validation checkpoints, and the content respects token budget. The main weakness is that examples are structural patterns rather than fully executable code, though this is partially justified by the dynamic nature of tool discovery.
Suggestions
Consider adding one complete end-to-end example showing actual tool slugs and arguments returned from a real RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call to make the workflow more concrete
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding explanations of basic concepts. Every section serves a purpose with no padding or unnecessary context about what Benchmark Email is or how MCP works. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool call patterns with specific parameters, but uses pseudocode-style examples rather than fully executable code. The examples show structure but aren't copy-paste ready since they depend on dynamic values from search results. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 3-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoint (check connection status shows ACTIVE before proceeding). The setup section includes verification steps and the Known Pitfalls section reinforces validation requirements. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections progressing from prerequisites to setup to workflow to pitfalls. External reference to toolkit docs is one level deep and clearly signaled. Quick reference table provides efficient navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
- Commit
2790447
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.