CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bigmailer-automation

Automate Bigmailer tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

52

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./composio-skills/bigmailer-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an efficient, actionable single-file guide with concrete MCP call examples and a clear sequenced workflow. Its main gap is the absence of post-execution validation/error-recovery feedback loops for batch operations, which caps workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit post-execution validation step to the Core Workflow (e.g. check the response for errors/pagination tokens, retry or continue fetching until complete) to lift the batch-operation workflow cap.

Consolidate the repeated "always search first" guidance into one stated rule to remove redundancy.

Provide one fully-resolved copy-paste example (real tool_slug and arguments) for the most common Bigmailer operation to push actionability toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-sectioned with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; the only trims are minor redundancies such as "always search first" restated across Prerequisites, Tool Discovery, and Known Pitfalls, fitting the "efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed" anchor above the 3-anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete MCP call blocks with real parameters (e.g. RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS with queries/session, RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL with tool_slug/arguments) plus a Quick Reference table give mostly executable guidance; it stops short of 5 because common-case examples remain template-like with placeholders rather than copy-paste-ready complete cases.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Core Workflow Pattern sequences Discover → Check Connection → Execute with an ACTIVE-status checkpoint, but the batch-capable RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL / bulk-op steps have no result-validation or error-recovery feedback loop, so per the destructive/batch cap rule workflow_clarity cannot exceed 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present, content is organized into clear sections (Prerequisites, Setup, Tool Discovery, Core Workflow, Known Pitfalls, Quick Reference) with a summary table and no nested references; it is well-structured but slightly over the simple-skill threshold and not split across files, fitting the 4-anchor rather than the reference-split 5-anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly names its niche (Bigmailer via Rube MCP/Composio) but stays generic on actions and omits any explicit use-when trigger, which caps completeness. It is distinct but follows a templated pattern that overlaps with sibling Rube skills.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Automate Bigmailer tasks" with 1-2 concrete actions (e.g. "send broadcasts, manage subscribers, and trigger workflows in Bigmailer").

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause, e.g. "Use when the user wants to automate Bigmailer email campaigns or subscriber management."

Include a natural synonym or file/term variation beyond the brand name to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain and mechanism ("Automate Bigmailer tasks via Rube MCP (Composio)") but the only action verb is the generic "Automate... tasks" with no concrete Bigmailer operations listed, matching the "names domain, actions minimal/generic" anchor rather than the 3-anchor which requires concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (automate Bigmailer tasks via Rube MCP) but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance — "Always search tools first" is a behavioral directive, not a when — so per the missing-trigger-cap rule completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Bigmailer" is a natural product-name keyword a user would actually say, but the remaining terms ("Rube MCP", "Composio", "search tools") are technical jargon with no common synonyms or variations, fitting the "some relevant keywords but missing variations" anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Bigmailer brand plus the Rube MCP/Composio integration gives it a clear, mostly-distinct niche, but the templated "Automate X tasks via Rube MCP... Always search tools first" phrasing risks minor overlap with sibling Rube/Composio automation skills, fitting the 4-anchor rather than the minimal-conflict 5-anchor.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.