Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-disclosed skill body that appropriately delegates detail to a single real reference file. It sacrifices in-body actionability and workflow detail, relying on the reference for the executable guidance and validation steps.
Suggestions
Inline 2-3 of the most common root commands (e.g., `pnpm validate:agent-skills`, `pnpm test`) or a one-line branch rule so the skill is actionable without always opening the reference.
Surface the key validation/checkpoint from the reference inline (e.g., the changeset and generated-file boundaries) so PR-preparation workflows have an explicit feedback step in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is only three lines, assumes Claude's competence, and contains no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows—every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives one concrete, executable directive ('Read references/repository-workflow.md') but no commands, examples, or specific steps for the common cases, leaving it incomplete rather than fully actionable. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | It defines a clear precondition (read the reference before changing files) tied to a concrete trigger set, but the actual multi-step workflow lives entirely in the reference file with no inlined checkpoints or validation feedback loops. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview pointing to one real, one-level-deep reference (references/repository-workflow.md exists and is clearly signaled), with good structure but no section headers organizing multiple reference paths. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |