Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An extremely lean, well-structured pointer skill: the body wastes no tokens, defers detail cleanly to a real, one-level-deep, well-organized reference, and its single conditional action is unambiguous. Its one real weakness is actionability — the body contains no inline quick rules or examples, so all executable substance lives one file away.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 critical inline rules to the body so the costliest mistakes are covered even without loading the reference — e.g., "Default base branch is `next`" and "Never edit `ts/vendor/`".
Include one concrete example of the workflow in the body, such as the branch/PR sequence (branch from `origin/next`, target PRs at `next`), so the most common task is actionable immediately.
State briefly what to do after reading the reference (e.g., apply the changeset rules when published TypeScript packages change) so the body guides the follow-through, not just the context load.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is three lean lines with zero padding — "Use this skill to orient work in the Composio SDK repository" plus a single condition-scoped read directive — assuming Claude's competence with every token earning its place. It is not 4 because there is nothing to trim at all. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The one directive — "Read `references/repository-workflow.md` before changing files when the task touches more than one package, release metadata, generated files, or branch/PR workflow" — is concrete (exact path, explicit conditions), but it is the body's only guidance: no inline commands, examples, or critical quick rules (e.g., default branch is `next`, `ts/vendor/` is read-only), so all substantive instruction is deferred. It is not 2 because the pointer is specific and executable rather than a high-level hint, and not 4 because the gap is not minor — the body alone provides nothing beyond "open this file". | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill and its single action — conditionally read the reference before changing files — is unambiguous, with the four preconditions crisply enumerated; the rubric's simple-skill exception applies. It is not 4 because there is no sequencing ambiguity or missing checkpoint for what the body actually instructs. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle matches the body: `references/repository-workflow.md` exists, is one level deep, and holds the well-organized detailed rules (branches, layout, tooling commands, changesets, vendor boundaries), while the body is a clear overview with a well-signaled, condition-scoped pointer. It is not 4 because navigation is trivial and the split is appropriate with no organization gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |