Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily lean body that appropriately delegates detail to a well-organized, one-level-deep reference containing executable commands. The only gaps are the absence of any inline command and an explicit pass/fail checkpoint in the verification workflow.
Suggestions
Add one or two inline commands (e.g. `pnpm create:provider <name>` or the typecheck/test verification line) so the body is actionable without requiring the reference read for the most common case.
In the reference's Verification section, add an explicit checkpoint such as 'Only proceed to pnpm build:packages when typecheck and tests pass; fix and re-run on failure.' to close the validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is three lean lines with zero padding or over-explanation; it assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body gives one concrete, executable instruction ('Read `references/provider-workflow.md` before changing a TypeScript provider') and the referenced file contains copy-paste-ready commands, but the body itself has no inline commands, a minor gap below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The referenced workflow lays out a clear create -> implement -> verify sequence with explicit verification commands (typecheck, test, build); it lacks an explicit 'only proceed when passing' checkpoint, which is a minor validation gap rather than an absent one. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that signals a single one-level-deep reference ('references/provider-workflow.md', which exists) and the reference is well-sectioned, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |