Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary progressive-disclosure router: minimal, conditioned pointers to two real, well-scoped reference files. Its only weakness is that the body defers all executable content — a one-line quick-start command inline would make the common case actionable without opening a reference.
Suggestions
Add a single inline quick-start command (e.g., the most common verification like `pnpm --filter <package> test` or `pnpm typecheck`) so trivial needs are actionable without opening a reference file.
State the post-read step explicitly (e.g., "then choose the narrowest command that covers the changed files") so the selection workflow is complete within the skill.
Clarify precedence when both triggers apply (e.g., adding new CLI test coverage) — currently the reader must infer that both references apply.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The six-line body contains no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every sentence either states the skill's purpose or directs a conditioned read of a reference file. It matches "lean and efficient; every token earns its place". | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete for a router skill: specific file paths ("references/test-commands.md", "ts/packages/cli/test/") tied to specific trigger conditions. However, the body itself contains no runnable command or quick-start example — all executables are deferred to the references — so it is "mostly executable guidance with minor gaps" rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The routing conditions are clear and well-separated ("before running broad checks or adding new test coverage" vs. "before writing or modifying tests under ts/packages/cli/test/"), and no validation cap applies since there are no destructive or batch operations. But the actual command-selection workflow lives entirely in the reference file with no inline quick path or post-read step, placing it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both referenced files (references/test-commands.md, references/effect-v4-cli.md) exist and are clearly signaled with when-to-read conditions; detail is appropriately split out of the overview with nothing inlined that belongs in a reference. The cross-link from test-commands.md to effect-v4-cli.md stays within the same level, so references remain effectively one level deep. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |