Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A deliberately minimal body that offloads all specifics to a well-structured reference file. Conciseness and progressive disclosure are strong, but actionability and workflow clarity suffer because no concrete commands or selection guidance appear in SKILL.md itself.
Suggestions
Inline one or two representative commands (e.g. `pnpm --filter @composio/<package> test` and `pnpm typecheck`) so the skill is actionable without opening the reference.
Add brief guidance on how to choose between test scopes (package filter vs. E2E runtime vs. full `pnpm test`) directly in the body, leaving exhaustive lists to the reference.
State an explicit verification checkpoint, such as running typecheck after package tests, to give the single-step workflow a clear validation beat.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Three lean lines that assume Claude's competence and point to a reference; every token earns its place with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body only offers a high-level hint ('Read references/test-commands.md') with no concrete commands or examples inline; execution detail is entirely delegated to the reference. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A single precondition-gated action ('Read ... before running broad checks or adding new test coverage') is clear, but no checkpoints or sequence for choosing among the many test commands exist in the body. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Lean overview pointing to one real, one-level-deep reference that is clearly signaled; the overview is thin and does not preview the reference's contents, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |