Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and self-contained, with a clear required workflow and hard rules that constrain behavior. Minor gains are available by trimming repeated anti-drift emphasis and making the worked example's call arguments more concrete.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'do not rely on prior knowledge' guidance so it appears once in the intro and is referenced, not restated, in the hard rules.
Replace the generic placeholders in the worked example with a realistic intent and concrete args so the example is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. what to do when a service_call fails or a method is not found in the description) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete tool list, a tight workflow, and a generic worked example, but the 'do not rely on prior knowledge' message is restated across the intro and hard rules, which could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete tool names, parameter shapes, and a worked example with real calls, but the example uses generic placeholders ('do X with my Y', '["…"]') rather than fully copy-paste-ready invocations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 'Required workflow' is a clear sequence with explicit branch/stop checkpoints (no candidates → stop; non-public → stop), though it lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Tools, Required workflow, Hard rules, Worked example), giving easy navigation with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |