Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable crash-analysis workflow with concrete commands and clear sequencing. Its main weakness is redundancy: GitHub-link guidance and the report template recur across several sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the GitHub-link guidance (currently spread across 'GitHub Link Generation', 'Path construction', and two 'Important Guidelines' bullets) into one section and reference it once.
Trim the full Output Format template, which duplicates the structure already produced by Phases 1-5; keep only the section headings and required fields.
Move the large worked example block in 'Path construction' into a short reference or trim it to one example, since the format and single-line example already convey the rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~200-line body is mostly efficient but repeats GitHub-link guidance across multiple sections and fully re-templates a report structure already implied by the phases, which could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (git log patterns, Glob patterns, mkdir/powershell output-directory commands) and a worked GitHub-link format with examples, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced with numbered sub-steps and fallback checkpoints (Glob retry, continue-with-missing-info); the read-only analysis scope means destructive-feedback-loop requirements do not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and everything is inline, but the body is well-organized into phases, an output template, and guidelines; the full output template and repeated link guidance could be trimmed for a cleaner overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |