Error Stack Trace Analysis for dd-trace-dotnet
57
36%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
94%
1.56xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/analyze-error/SKILL.mdAnalyze a redacted exception that was encountered within an application running dd-trace-dotnet. The exception was caught by dd-trace-dotnet, redacted, and then sent to Datadog's log intake. The goal is to: understand the error, determine if it is caused by dd-trace-dotnet, determine how to reproduce, determine how to prevent it (not catch it).
User provided the basic error message along with the redacted stack trace. First line will be the Error Message - this is a constant message template that dd-trace-dotnet will log and send to Datadog Following lines will be the stack trace.
The user may have entered additional context info afterwards such as descriptions, PR links, versions the error was seen on.
If it appears that duck typing is involved, prior to doing deep analysis go over the source code within dd-trace-dotnet\tracer\src\Datadog.Trace\DuckTyping\ as it is vital to have a clear understanding of this for proper error reconstruction.
When necessary refer to the official source of known third party libraries that are within the stack to provide better error reconstruction.
Use Markdown Do not use tables
Stack Trace, Component / CODEOWNER team, Actionability
2 to 3 sentences that can be used to explain what is happening.
Detailed analysis outlining the code flow that leads to the error. Format as follows:
Before / after code comparison, format this as a git diff
Provide an overview of how to reproduce this error.
6249bb4
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.