Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, action-oriented flaky-test workflow with strong validation gates, feedback loops, and a report checklist. Slightly dense prose and the absence of concrete commands keep it from being fully lean and copy-paste executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense procedural prose that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining known concepts (no "what is a flaky test" padding), though several long sentences could be tightened, keeping it just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directives ("state a one-line candidate mechanism", search by "violated invariant and lifecycle owner", "Use fake timers instead of real-time waits", run "coverage and lint from AGENTS.md") give executable guidance with only minor gaps and no literal copy-paste commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear classify-once gate flows into a 6-step fix sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ("Do not reproduce or search test code before this gate", "Do not design a fix before this sentence holds", "Verify the original failure without the fix") and a 5-item report checklist, satisfying the feedback-loop requirement for batch cohort fixes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear sections (Classify once, Investigate and fix, Hung jobs, Parallel investigation, Report) and one inline one-level external reference (AGENTS.md); no bundle files exist to split, but the body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, so it stops short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |