Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, executable, and clearly sequenced with strong validation checkpoints and a clean one-level bundle reference; only minor conciseness and placeholder-handling gaps prevent a top score across the board.
Suggestions
Replace the literal opt/<crate>-<technique> in commands with an explicit instruction to substitute values, or show a fully concrete example branch, to maximize copy-paste readiness.
Consider pointing to assets/commit-template.txt earlier and trimming the inlined commit-message example to avoid duplicating the template content.
Tighten the 'hunt will / hunt does NOT' lists into a single concise responsibilities table to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, phased structure with executable commands that assumes Claude's competence; only minor repetition in the 'hunt will / does NOT' boundary list keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready bash (git checkout, commit, gh pr create) and a full commit-message example; the literal opt/<crate>-<technique> placeholder is a small gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phases 0-4 with an explicit STOP checkpoint for a dirty working directory and a critical return-to-Phase-3 guard, plus delegated validation to /lading-optimize-review. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is a concise overview with a single well-signaled one-level reference to assets/commit-template.txt (a real bundle file); minor room to tighten the inlined commit example toward the template. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |